General Augusto Heleno has strongly refuted allegations of a coup attempt, labeling the accusations as nothing more than "argumentative flat earth." The controversial statement came as he presented his defense on Thursday, the 6th, in response to mounting scrutiny.
Heleno's choice of words, comparing the coup denunciation to the outdated and scientifically disproven idea of a flat earth, suggests a complete rejection of the claims. He argues that the accusations are based on unfounded speculation rather than concrete evidence.
Key Witnesses Support Heleno's Defense
In presenting his defense, General Heleno named Hamilton Mourão and Marcelo Queiroga as witnesses. Their inclusion signals a strategic move to bolster his position and counter the narratives surrounding the alleged coup attempt. The testimonies of these individuals could prove crucial in shaping the public perception of the events in question.

The involvement of Mourão and Queiroga adds another layer of complexity to the situation. Their alignment with Heleno's defense could indicate a broader consensus among certain political and military figures regarding the coup allegations.
The Meaning Behind "Argumentative Flat Earth"
The phrase "argumentative flat earth" is particularly striking. It implies that those pushing the coup narrative are clinging to a demonstrably false idea, ignoring evidence and logic in favor of a preconceived conclusion. This rhetorical strategy aims to discredit the accusers and undermine the credibility of their claims.
"The denunciation of the coup is nothing more than argumentative flat earth," Heleno stated, according to sources.

What's Next?
The presentation of Heleno's defense marks a significant moment in this ongoing saga. As the legal proceedings unfold, the testimonies of Hamilton Mourão and Marcelo Queiroga will undoubtedly be closely scrutinized. The ultimate outcome will likely have far-reaching implications for the political landscape.
The use of such strong language – labeling the accusations as "argumentative flat earth" – underscores the intensity of the debate and the high stakes involved.

The coming weeks and months will undoubtedly reveal more details about this contentious issue and the individuals involved.