The Trump era was marked by significant shifts in US policy, both domestically and internationally. Several key events and decisions sparked debate and controversy, raising questions about the administration's priorities and long-term impact.
Government Layoffs and Policy Shifts
Early in the administration, a government lay-offs directive was quietly amended following widespread chaos caused by the firing of thousands of workers. This move prompted concerns about the stability of the workforce and the potential for disruption across various sectors. 
The specific reasons for the initial directive and the subsequent amendment remain a subject of speculation, but the incident highlighted the administration's willingness to make significant policy adjustments.
Trade Wars and International Relations
The administration's approach to international trade also generated considerable friction. The imposition of 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, two of America's largest trading partners, triggered immediate retaliatory measures. Canada responded with its own tariffs, and Mexico vowed to follow suit, escalating the situation into a full-blown trade war. This aggressive stance raised concerns about the potential economic consequences for all parties involved.
"The Trump administration slapped 25% tariffs on America's two biggest trading partners, Mexico and Canada."
The impact extended beyond economics, straining diplomatic relations with long-standing allies. This approach to trade represented a departure from traditional US foreign policy, emphasizing bilateral deals and protectionist measures over multilateral agreements.
NATO, Taiwan, and America's Global Role
Perhaps one of the most debated aspects of the Trump administration was its view of America's role in the world. Questions arose about the future of key alliances, particularly NATO. As one article questioned, "When I asked last week if NATO could survive Trump, I wondered if I had gone too far. It seems I did not go far enough." This sentiment reflected a growing concern that the administration's policies and rhetoric were undermining the strength and unity of the alliance. 
The administration's stance on Taiwan also came under scrutiny. During a hearing for Elbridge Colby, a nominee for a high-ranking position in the Defence Department, Republican senators questioned his views on protecting Taipei. His perceived "softened" stance raised concerns about the US commitment to defending Taiwan against potential aggression.
These events collectively paint a picture of an administration that was willing to challenge established norms and prioritize its own vision of American interests, often at the expense of international cooperation and diplomatic relations. The long-term consequences of these policies continue to be debated and analyzed.
